Ah yes, nuclear energy — the political third rail that’s suddenly back in fashion as Australia heads into a federal election. The mere mention of it used to send politicians ducking for cover, but now, with AI, data centres, climate concerns, and an insatiable global appetite for energy, the conversation is impossible to ignore.
But let’s not fool ourselves — this is not just about keeping the lights on. This is about global security, international power dynamics, and the geopolitical tug-of-war over energy dominance. (Disclaimer, I am in this article not for or against. It is more about a current problem we have and a so called element on the periodic table, essential to everything in life, that has been forgotten).
And yet, in all this noise, one major player has been left behind: hydrogen — the so-called “fuel of the future” that has seemingly disappeared or hidden from the news feeds while nuclear hogs the spotlight. So what happened, and why does this matter beyond Australia’s borders?
If the last few years have taught us anything, it’s that energy security is national security. Wars aren’t just fought with tanks and missiles anymore — they’re fought with semiconductor shortages, cyberattacks on power grids, and strategic energy dependence.
AI and emerging technologies are energy gluttons. Training one large AI model can burn through as much electricity as 100,000 households in a year. Data centres worldwide are competing with entire nations for power consumption. In this kind of world, energy isn’t just an infrastructure issue — it’s a strategic weapon.
For Australia, sticking to outdated energy strategies isn’t just bad economics, it’s a national security blind spot.
The nuclear debate has become a political football, with different sides either championing it as a climate saviour or warning about long build times, costs, and waste concerns.
But while nuclear gets all the PR buzz, hydrogen — the quiet underdog — has been all but forgotten. Just a few years ago, hydrogen was the golden child, with global investment pouring in. Now? Crickets.
Why?
And you know the funny thing. Clean hydrogen can be produced with minimal emissions using methane. Basically from effluent sources and we have a non stop and unlimited supply of that.
The world is splitting into energy haves and have-nots. Australia sits on the fence, undecided and unprepared, while the global energy superpowers dictate the next century of geopolitical influence.
So, what do we do?
The world is at a turning point. Cybersecurity, AI, global tensions, and energy security are colliding in ways we’ve never seen before. There is discussion that the AI and semiconductor technology is the next arms race but we believe it bigger than that. Energy. After all, we need the energy to fun all these wonderful things.
If Australia doesn’t take decisive action on energy independence now, we won’t just be playing catch-up — we’ll be handing over control of our future to those who planned ahead.
So, will we shape the energy landscape, or will we just react to it?
What do you think? Is nuclear the way forward? Is hydrogen still in the game? Or are we just watching another geopolitical power play unfold in real time? And be nice!!